essaysbysean.blogspot.com
It’s finally time I wrote about me—sort
of.
On the Internet, it amuses me how
bloggers are eager to share what they had for breakfast while essayists, in
contrast, can get engaged and married without breathing a word in their essays.
Perhaps essayists are too uptight, or modest to a fault. Or maybe they just
believe in crafting really focused essays.
As for myself, I think my life is just
too boring for others to care about: That’s what I told my fellow students last
week—I’m taking a night class in creative nonfiction. My excuse for posting
some class assignments here is that I’m finally revealing a little about me.
Besides, I don’t like to “waste” anything I write, not if I can put it out
there again. (In fact, I just took last week’s web essay down to my college
alumni magazine)
Here are three short assignments:
They don’t focus directly on me, yet they are revealing. My classmates in my
real life found the pieces interesting; so here’s hoping some readers in
cyberspace will too.
Assignment One: Find a
newspaper article that moves you. Encourage readers to feel too. 250-300 words.
Orphan
In my life I’ve earned a one-year
college certificate, a college diploma and a university degree. I’m smart, by
the grace of God, and I have good will towards those not-so-smart: They too
have their story. You could say I’m conservative, don’t swear and I go to
school: These three attributes describe everyone in the family of Juliana
Tolifson—everyone except, explains Juliana, herself. She is a hairdresser with tattoos—she
came to her family from an orphanage back when Romania was under communism. She
says she’s nuts, she’s the black sheep, and she wants to meet someone like her.
Now she’s nearing the end of a seven-year quest to learn more about herself by finding
her birth mother. The only photo Juliana has is one of her mother wearing a
leopard print bra under a white T-shirt: Juliana can really relate.
I’ve often met people like her, cheerful
and spinny—the folks who never get into the history books or the weekly TV
dramas or the Sears catalogues. They don’t read books, they don’t know world
politics—still, they are optimistic about their community and willing to do
their part.
I am touched when folks like
Juliana learn how I read so much and then respond by marveling, being too nice
to call me four-eyes. Perhaps Juliana is nice because back in elementary school
she was bullied for being a “foreign kid.” Today she’s a successful hair
stylist, getting ten different big Romanian flowers tattooed all down her arm.
I’m old enough to be her uptight uncle, without any tattoos, but I wish her
well. I sure hope her birth mom agrees to meet with her.
Assignment Two: Write about someone who you admire, or on why you became a writer. (I did both at once!) Maximum 400 words.
Orwell
I am older now than my spiritual
father, George Orwell, was when he died of tuberculosis. For me his essays are
what he will be remembered for. The man who wrote great essays could also write
Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-four.
Orwell knew imperialism first hand.
One hot day, as a young police officer and administrator in Burma, he found
himself walking with an army officer, from his own class, behind a file of common
British soldiers. He really didn’t
like their smell that day—and he knew this was mere class prejudice, since the soldiers
were all healthy, well fed and well washed. Admitting his fault, he also
admitted the same nation that imperializes foreigners would imperialize each
other. Call it: Divide by class and conqueror. He took action: resigning his
commission, and going back to England, there to mingle with the lower orders,
the “proletariat,” enough to shake off his prejudice. (To quote another writer,
“he (They) walked away from Omelas”)
Like many idealists of his time he
knew there had to be something better, a world where all people could be equal
comrades. Yet, unlike the rest of his generation, he knew that bloodstained, actively
lying communism was not the answer. To him, a socialist England would still have
soldiers guarding Buckingham palace with the buttons on their tunics inscribed
with, as he titled his essay, The Lion
and the Unicorn.
I too am a writer; I was born in
the 1950’s; and I too had to invent myself. Orwell had the word “sensitivity”
in his vocabulary: He once took the measure of Rudyard Kipling by saying Kipling
had enough sensitivity to write, and just enough insensitivity to fraternize with imperialists east of Suez. Other
writers, noted Orwell, would not leave London for the colonies. Now “sensitivity”
is part of my own vocabulary, as one more bit of my own self-invention.
Orwell was socialist, yet not a communist.
Reformist, yet not a sandal wearing vegetarian crank. Leftist, yet sympathetic
to the flag and soldiers. A scholar of revolution, yet sympathetic to the actual
working class, not to some romanticized “proletariat.” An intellectual, yet he
fought with volunteers in the Spanish Civil War. To me he remains a model of a
man who would not hate, nor deceive himself, nor lie for any cause. A decent
man… I try to be as decent as he.
Assignment Three: Write about a setting.
Maximum 500 words. (This, like the above, was an exercise for me in word
processing, as I kept adding and cutting to get under the word count)
Concert at the Lantern
On a cold prairie night, in the
older part of the city, I find the Lantern Church. A little paper sign on the
door says, “Pull the handle down hard.” I manage the little handle and step inside.
Smiling people take my ticket, and
I walk down, down past rows of long curving pews filled up with spiritual
people. I sit. Many folks here have a past, many would say they are on a
healing journey. Now I see people happy and eager, with spouses and families
and jobs—the past is the past.
I see Margret, the mother of Eily
Aurora. I see a man operating a camera on a tripod—it’s David, Eily’s father.
I’ve known the couple since Eily was teenager, later Eily was active on campus,
now she’s actively staging her second concert. Set on stage is Eily’s harp, and
her Japanese sitar. Also on stage is Trevor’s Australian didgeridoo, and drums
that have surely been used in a drumming circles. I know Trevor from Miracles
Toastmasters. Later they’ll be joined by a goateed guy with an electronic base
guitar and by a bearded young man who uses vocal sounds as an instrument; he
has a Celtic drum too.
Eily had told me last week she was
scared; but that’s natural. Tonight she does fine. Speaking slowly enough and
lovingly enough she speaks of owls and vision quests and invites us to listen
for what comes up for us. We begin the concert with silence… as many folks
close their eyes.
As for the audience, no one is
dressing to conform. No suits or ties. No one minds wearing color, or embroidery,
or stripes on their jeans. All have warm fuzzy friendly fabrics; no one wears
plain blue cold polyester.
None would describe themselves as
rigid. In fact, I suppose I’m one of the more rigid ones here. Yes, I know music
is like modern art; I realize I get out of it only what I put into opening myself
up to: I “need to sit with it.” I know this, but it’s still hard. At least on
this night I’m not actively uptight and dampening my feelings—that sort of life
was years ago.
And the music flows over that
spiritual crowd, over us all, with a beat and rhythm but no melody; voice, harp
and bell, and sometimes the team gets loud and fast to simulate the fact of
chaos. And then back down to beauty. People love it.
At the intermission it is clear
that people have brought their hearts. Some one freely yoga stretches. No one
hesitates to talk to anyone. A young lady with a red fuzzy toque tells me she
feels this is a good church: plain, not overly decorated, “It doesn’t take
money from the people.”
The music resumes. We clap. We
echo. Folks are invited to sit on the stage stairs as “receivers.” People dance
freely in the aisles.
…Pray for peace…
Sean Crawford, Calgary, 2014
Sean Crawford, Calgary, 2014