Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Humour and The War of the Worlds


Hello Reader,
Got a foundation for humour?


Humour is like the musician in a marching band who plays the cymbals: He asked his band master, “What’s the most important thing for me to know about playing the cymbals?” 
Answer: “…When!” 

For me to include in my War of the Worlds poetry manuscript a funny poem or two would be to ignore the film student who asked his teacher, “When do you insert a minute of comic relief into a terror movie such as Day of the Triffids?” 
Answer: “…You don’t!” 
Sometimes the subject matter, such as the entire human race being under assault by Triffids, is just too serious, even if this means inflicting a relentless tension on the poor audience. 

If the danger is merely to the lives of all the passengers and crew of an aircraft, because the two pilots have been incapacitated, then OK: There will be a brief scene of a passenger being funny. I am referring to the script of Flight Into Danger, which we took in school. Besides comic relief, it also had a recap scene, in the guise of an air traffic controller on the radio, because the movie, when televised, would be interrupted for “the six o’clock evening news, with Walter Cronkite.” That same movie, complete with a civilian former fighter pilot saying the plane flew “sluggish like a wet sponge” was later re-written to be Zero Hour, by the author of Airport, and then re-written again to be a feature comedy called Airplane.

On my blog, to give my readers their money’s worth—which ain’t much, the blog is free—I try to pair my War of the Worlds poems with a wee prose essay. After all, not everybody likes poetry—go figure. My poem today is not a comedy, as I wanted unity of tone, (When? You don’t!) hence the sober mid verse, but I did try for a fun rhythm to match at the happiness at the passing of the evil Martians.

Meanwhile, how ‘bout that foundation for humour?

As a child, back in the days of weekly frontier shows such as Daniel Boone and Davy Crocket, (King of the wild frontier) I remember a children’s book with a scene where a one-room-school teacher is looking down at a little brother and sister who are so very serious and quiet. At the time, I thought, as the teacher did, that farm life must have beaten them down. Like the grey people on a farm with Dorothy in Kansas (You may recall it was only her dog Toto that kept Dorothy from being grey too)

As an adult, knowing that struggling Abraham Lincoln, as a child in his family lean-to, (before the log cabin) had no time to even make soap, yet nevertheless managed to have good humour, I remain skeptical that a harsh life would mean no sense of comedy. As a young man Lincoln was valued on work crews for his humorous stories, even as farmers hated how his stories distracted the crews from their labour. Perhaps that girl and boy were oppressed not by their labour but by their parents… Just as novelist Pat Conroy was.

Recently I came across a line in a Pat Conroy book where he once more tries to understand his horrible father, a father exposed in Conroy’s nonfiction memoir My Losing Season, written after his father’s death, and, from during his dad’s lifetime, Conroy’s first fiction novel The Great Santini. 

Question: How horrible was Pat’s dad, Santini? Answer: Conroy didn’t think any of his siblings would attend their father’s funeral. Seriously. But they did, because of the novel. 

It happened this way: To be publishable, Conroy had to tone down just how horrible the actual great Santini really was. The novel was commercial success, complete with a movie version starring Robert Duval. Then a strange thing happened: Santini decided to live up to his hero image. He changed. By the time he died, the whole town came out to his funeral, and so did his children.

(The flip side to Santini’s change is people living down to a bad image. As in the old folk saying, “If you give a dog a bad name, then you might as well hang him.”)

As for humour, here’s what I envision: As a US marine fighter pilot and squadron leader, Santini would surely have a fine sense of humour, not just to give himself some laughs, but for group morale too, especially when the going got tough, and of course to buck up any marine who was failing to cope, “dragging his tail.” Nobody ever said the marine corps was easy. I can’t imagine any marine being without enough ego to show his pals that he too could crack a joke. 

So imagine how dumbfounded I was to read, in Conroy’s final nonfiction memoir, something about his dad:

“Of all the shameful things he did to us when we were kids, he never once made us laugh. In his retirement years, Dad had surprised himself and shocked his children by developing a terrific sense of humor.”

I had to put the book down and start to think: In our everyday life, don’t we try to make our loved ones laugh? If something amusing happens in the morning, don’t we save it up to tell them in the evening when they come home? Doesn’t looking out for them include, besides asking how their day went, also trying to support them to feel better about themselves, and trying to make them laugh? Don’t nearly all people, including parents, role model behaving this way? Well, not my parents, and not the great Santini. That man was a poor excuse for a father, being neither safe nor supportive.

I put the book down, stared into space, and realized: My family of origin was a lot like Santini… I can remember, in my twenties, feeling a surge of anger when a wife and college student told me she “wanted her kids to feel good about themselves.” Not Santini, not for his kids, and not my parents for theirs. In our family, I regret to say, I am sure the youngest three children, including me, were rather like those two frontier kids. Seriously. (The older three children had known better times)

Those three kids eventually came to realize they had a humour gap. In my case, before there would be any point in rushing out to buy a book of jokes and one-liners, hoping against hope I could thereby learn to be funny, I needed first to get a handle on the 
foundations of humour: 
Looking for the good in others, projecting warmth, and reflecting on how “angels fly because they take themselves lightly.” No mortal can discern something funny, or generate humour, while uptight… or while desperately obsessing, struggling and straining to become “good enough.” Better if I take it easy, knowing I am already loved, by the Lord. And then, over time, learning what a humour-state feels like, the way stage-actors learn what a relaxed body feels like.

I can relate to a certain atheist hard-drinking fellow, truly as atheist as any other alcoholic, who got into recovery in AA, and who at last said, “Some need God to avoid hell, I need God because I’ve already been to hell.” I hear you, brother. I guess God sits next to the lightest of angels.

As it happens, at the same the time I knew that lady in college, I was seeing a college counsellor, while role modelling humour from a few people in both my past and present. Hey, that’s a nice thought: People are never really gone if you can still role model off of them. (I still learn from Abe Lincoln) 

Another thought: You’re never solely a victim if you can help others. And help I did. And do. As a life style. Recently I received a reply to my e-mail, which had been a reply to a sensitive poet. By “hear it” she means the e-letter:

Thanks for the reply Sean, I hear it in your voice which is always fun and often involves humour! I have read this at a difficult time as my mom isn't well, and your words brought a smile. Thank you…

She ended with a quip of her own, then graciously said, “Happy Easter.”

Being gracious is something else I had to learn as an adult. So I looked up from my screen and thought, “Hey, I’ve got fun and humour in my voice! Not bad, for a serious survivor of a home unsafe, a home relentlessly unsupportive. Not bad at all.”




Poem

In a dusty depopulated land recovering from the onslaught of the Martians, I imagine a good, clean, wholesome couple having access to pre-war goods. Those two might sound too good to be true, but hey, if I can imagine them then they can exist. As a healthy ex-convict once said, “What a man can conceive, a man can achieve.”


Jasper and Holly
Jasper and Holly were known to go bike,
past crumbling towns to wherever they’d like.
They were always so clean, a couple so blessed,
who stayed to be welcomed, then pedalled off west,
with glimmering chimes and a bell.

Jasper and Holly carried bags of good fun;
sour old clouds would yield to their sun.
They brought popcorn to pop, and sweet brown toffee,
ointments and gauze, and real canned coffee,
and wore Rover berets of bright blue.

Back at home
Jasper leaves the toilet seat up,
Holly scatters clothes unfolded.
She asks: Do you love me?

Jasper would sing and Holly told jokes;
they had one story they always told folks:
“There’s no terror, no chills, nothing to fear
as at sunset we coast in our slowest gear
past a Tripod that leans, just a dark shell
with its Martian long gone, 
gone down to hell.”


Sean Crawford
April
Calgary
2019

Shadenfreud Sidebar:
I for one, shudder at all those oodles of pythons, with no natural enemies, in the Florida everglades. Not funny. Our NATO allies have a word, shadenfreud, meaning to laugh or take pleasure in someone else’s misfortune. High above NATO and planet earth, I wonder if Aliens from space would feel shadenfeud at how pathetic humans, generation after generation, keep failing to learn the lessons of a) don’t do war, and b) don’t bring in invasive species.

National Geographic magazine, for April, has a special edition on Cities. One of the cover titles is Rats—they’ll always be with us. As you know, rats came over here from Europe. The practise of putting a cone over the hawser so the rats don’t crawl to shore was not observed by our pathetic ancestors. That’s not funny to me, still no shadenfreud.

“Cough.” If I was to have shadenfrued, which I don’t—who, me?—then I would tell you that my city, and the cities north of me, and to the south, are totally rat-free. Hope you’re not too jealous, but I live in the largest rat-free land mass in the free world! Ha-ha. How? Well, here on the flat prairie, (Joke) you can see the rats coming. You then call in the Rat Patrol—yes, that’s their actual name; yes, they’re taxpayer funded; yes, I say thank God for government—whenever you have any sightings at the border. We still need to build our farm grain silos out of corrugated steel or cement, but we don’t have nearly the loss to our gross domestic product (GDP) that we would have if we allowed rats into the fields.

Did I say the plains are flat? Joke: How flat are they? You can watch your dog run away from home for two days.

Update: Someone at BBC reads my blog. Here's (link) a story on "rat free cities."

Footnotes:
~Folks have put up Youtubes with with a side-by-side comparison of the two Airplane movies: one serious, one comic. Here’s a link to a shorter Youtube.

~If I preface a line intended to make you smile with “joke,” then it’s because the humour gear is not one’s default, I want to give you a micro second to gear up. That’s “up” not down, as the synonym for laughter, levity, comes from the same Greek base as levitation, as in lightness. The opposite is “grave” as in gravity, and the grave face of Lincoln, who dripped melancholy as he walked—no wonder he needed his famous Lincoln humour.

~In one of the Austen Powers comedy spy movies, the scene where the evil genius bounces a harmless beach ball off his son’s head and says, “Are you gonna cry now, are you gonna cry?” was a satire of a scene in the Santini movie, where the father kept bouncing a hard basketball off his son’s head. So I guess The Great Santini movie did well at the box office, back in the day, if folks still remember. (Critic Roger Ebert gave it 4/5 stars)

~Conroy’s final book about his dad was The Death of Santini: The story of a father and his son. The quote in italics above is on page 155. The book included revelations that struck me like a blow, but that would be best told in another essay.

~In a family like mine it is normal to “kinda, sorta know” that things are wrong, while also failing to grasp the impossible truth—God gives us “denial” (mental defence) for a reason. Even our greater society, with generations of folk sayings, proverbs and folk tales for coping, dares not be too “clued in.” Hence even at my age, I must confess, I am still learning about things.


~As Tiny Tim says, “God bless us, everyone.”

~Update: Today I found this on the Free Fall blog

In Summer

I never thought you’d leave in summer.
The hardest part of school was over, I’d marked my last exam, graded my last essay, and at last I could relax with you. Weren’t we going to go to the lake? I wanted to see you laughing on a boat. Lord knows I haven’t laughed all semester, nor you, nor have I tried to make you laugh.
And that’s it, I guess. I stopped trying, and we stopped relating to each other in any sort of a rhythm. I did my teacher thing, with teacher facts, just as I would write on a dusty chalkboard, but there’s no rhythm there.
 Sean Crawford, June 5, 2015

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Second Opinion on Life

Hello Reader
Of course you are right, but—
Got second opinion? 


From the 1970’s come two TV characters from two shows, All in the Family and Happy Days—The bigoted father, Archie Bunker, and the cool “bad” motorcyclist with his white T-shirt and leather jacket, “the Fonze.” They had something in common: Both would get lockjaw trying to say, “I was w-w-w-wrong.” Same as my dear brother-in-law. Recently I’ve been looking in the mirror…

Even that epitome of cool, the Fonze, ( raising his thumbs to affirm, “Ehhhh!”) couldn’t be right all the time, no, not even in fanciful TV land. In my everyday world, it would be such a comfort to believe everyone has common sense, and that “of course everybody knows” common things—but no. There is a good reason why newspapers and traditional media, on a continuing Big Important Story, on each successive day, must retread the same old ground, and keep on repeating what has just happened. People don’t always know. Maybe “they should” but the plain truth is they don’t.

People are like some chunks in a box of cold cereal: After lots of shaking around by life, every chunk “should” be the same size, but there are always a few big pieces that seem to have slipped through the process. To me, every one of us are “big chunks:” We all seem to have “missed out” on different things, having gaps in our knowledge. Why? Easy: we live in a complex society. 

It’s so common to miss out on common things: I’m still chuckling over my friend, a university graduate, who didn’t know the “dirty thirties” were caused by the Wall Street stock market crash of late 1929. She innocently thought the Great Depression was caused by the mid-west “dust bowl.” 
(My principal told us how a farmer would plow a field all day, then, during the night, lose every last teaspoon of his topsoil, gone with the wind)

Respect for human nature, and for ordinary ethical journalism, is why my essays will have abbreviations spelled in full, explanations in brackets, and even the odd “as you know, comma.” I do this to be gentle on my readers. In school we took a short story about (from memory) The Man From Kalgoorlie who managed to go an entire year without knowing World War II had broken out. Yes, that’s only fiction, but stranger things have happened. 

(As you may know, the war started September 1, 1939, when the Germans, as part of the Axis powers, invaded Poland. Canada declared war on September third, and the First Canadian Division was in Britain later that year… The attack on Pearl Harbor, by some different fascists, was not until December 7, 1941. At least the major fascist countries learned a lesson. I can’t speak for smaller axis countries like, say, Italy or Romania, but I know that today Germany and Japan are peaceful to a fault)

Any remedy? Yes, a partial one: Listening, as humbly as I can, from knowing I surely have gaps. It’s not rocket science. The Chinese say, “When you go outdoors, look at the weather; when you come indoors, look at the faces.” While I am talking, I modestly check faces to see if I have abruptly sounded like an idiot. That is, unless we are imbibing and gesturing wildly in a pub—then we can all be idiots together.

In a social group, whether I’m flocking with delinquents on a street corner or hooting with a parliament of owls, it’s common sense: Don’t assume a motion or topic is worth discussing unless there is figuratively a seconder to the motion. And here’s another common sense metaphor: As a sailor, I don’t assume my “sea story” is worth telling to a crowd of sailors relaxing in the fo’c’s’le. Not unless I have first tested it on the ship’s cook, and then secretly lingered outside the hatch, to check to hear whether he tells it to the next fellow to enter the galley. (footnote)

The only thing you can’t test out is how to break bad news. A dozen mountain ranges away lived my dad. A few days after the death of dear old dad, my sweet sibling let me know. Some days later my friend Judy had a disturbed face: She just had to get back to me to ask why getting the news took a few days: “Is your family estranged?” 
“No, just slow.” 
(How slow? Dear Mom passed away later, in the summer of 2016, and today, Easter of 2019, with two of my slow siblings as co-executors, there is no sign yet of any estate money for us chickens. It’s no big deal—at least the taxes, submitted around Easter of 2018, have finally been done, I think)

As for estrangement, I once skimmed a link on the web. Turns out folks can be estranged, can be giving a relative the silent treatment for years and years, while at the same time the relative doesn’t know about the treatment, let alone know why. I can relate: Certainly I can hold a grudge for a long, long time without the other person having a clue. That may be OK for acquaintances, but for family? That would be too dumb. And too unworthy of me. Theoretically. 

And yet… I can remember telephoning my father across many mountain ranges to his time zone to ask, in effect, whether our family believes that just one thing can be “a deal killer,” as in being “not good enough to love.” I know, right? Shouldn’t have to ask, right? And yet I had felt so degraded, keeping shameful and silent about my family, as my bank manager remarked that even Jesse James, after robbing trains, was loved by his folks. 

There’s a good reason for the Good News story in the New Testament about a prodigal son. There’s another Gospel story, nearly two thousand years old now, of a man washing his hands and asking, “What is truth?”

The truth is that if I am especially ashamed and keeping silent about some notion I have, then I am especially needful to ask someone, anyone, for a “seconder to the notion.” Not asking my bar tender, who may solely listen, but asking someone who will answer my truth with his or her own truth. Perhaps by saying, “Yes, yes I do think you are wrong… being silly… and wrong.” How easy to be told I’m wrong about some exciting tavern trivia game, how very hard, something to be approached with fear and trembling, to be told I have been wrong about a close relative who has—which is “had” in the present tense—severely hurt my feelings. So often the “easy way out” is to feel offended, not hurt.

Something about offended anger is this: It’s always there, waiting, even if I change my mind about people. Like a hand-eye coordinated sports move, it remains to be called on, years later. Like how “everybody knows” that the same folks who have known peace since the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement would shoot and bomb and kill if tomorrow a customs “hard border” appeared across Ireland after Brexit. How queer: A baby born on Good Friday of that year would be 21 years old now… 

How tragic when nations who have strained and strived and finally achieved peace can just throw it all away, abruptly surrendering to an impulse for hatred. The capacity for anger remains. Today I desperately need my higher reasoning to know that life has moved on, that it’s silly, and that my old thinking, today, is something I was w-w-w-wrong about.

Today I’m avoiding my mirror… yet I just had to write, for me and you.


Sean Crawford
Trying not to subconsciously rebel about de-cluttering,
April
2019

Footnotes: 
~The sea story advice is from novelist Jan De Hartog in his nonfiction book, A Sailor’s Life. (You may download the book for free as a PDF, link)

~Some folks get their opinions from social media and false news. That’s a problem: The consensus is that social media is, too often, easily and wrongly forwarded by deniers of media ethics, just as as easily as folks will spread false gossip. For the journalism ethics practised by true ladies and gentlemen, see my three journalism essays archived in May and April of 2018. 

Note to my Irish-American cousins: You might snobbishly feel superior to the British Irish for their reverting to violence from seeing a “hard border,” (customs police in grim buildings) but hey, have you looked in the mirror? 

You and your pals wear flowers in your hair for a street protest, swearing up and down to each other that your march will be “a peaceful demonstration…” But then you riot… and the next morning? You tell news reporters it was the mere sight of hard armoured riot police that “made you riot.” Does that sound very adult of you, “they made me riot”? So don’t you go feeling superior to the Northern Irish.

~Funny: As for the hard border, my cousin Crazy Eddie thinks it should staffed exclusively by contractors from south of the border, Catholics, solely of the female gender, wearing mostly frilly pink civilian clothes from home, working in tents and pavilions gayly painted like gingerbread houses, with the real police, on call by walkie-talkie, sitting cozy, south of the border, in Irish pubs… Yup, there’s a reason why we call my cousin Crazy Eddie.     

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Brave Reservists and Martians

Headnote: I meant this piece to follow right after my Korean War post in March, called Christmas and Brine, but Brexit overtook me.

Hello Reader,
Got reservists?

Last week I sympathized with soldiers, so let’s keep to that theme. The young man I knew, in the background when I visited his parents, was a reservist, K.I.A.: I grieved hard for his folks. 

To me, the special thing about reservists is no one is truly forcing them to be there; That, and how as volunteers they are “bright eyed and bushy tailed,” uncynical, not merely doing “a job.”  To my knowledge, this is true for the UK, Canada and the Commonwealth ANZAC nations, but maybe not for the modern USA. Of the latter, I only know that I once spent a long desperate night with a US major (story for another time) who told me it took months to get his reservists up to a good standard. Then again, this was back in the 1970’s and his guys were not lily-white volunteers: By being reservists, they were exempt from going to Vietnam. 

Is reserve training too hard? Put it this way: I once knew a long haired teenager, in a legion marching band, who complained about having to hold his instrument up to his chin before they marched off. I was trying to understand such people during a thoughtful conversation with my base chaplain, an older man with a buzz cut. First thought: Both my chaplain and I mused: “He was only there because the band was going to go to Germany.”

Second thought: The chaplain asked, “What instrument did he play?” 

“The cymbals.”

The older soldier gave me a serious look and said, “There’s the answer: He wasn’t motivated. If he had been, then the discipline would not have seemed too hard.” 

So now that’s my answer as to whether the reserves are too hard too hard: If you are motivated, and see the training as part of carrying out the mission, then it will feel appropriate.

… In the novel War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells, the casualty rate among the regular units who face the Martians is nearly 100 per cent. In my poems the situation is like the Jurassic Park movies: You survive by not encountering the dinosaurs. 

On my blog, I am reprinting my poetry manuscript out of order. These next two poems are from when the Martians have passed on leaving the land depopulated, the economy in shambles. The narrator has two sisters, Janet and Susan.


Spotless Equipment

Make sure your equipment is spotless
said the middle aged dentist,
the stout factory foreman,
and the eager young postal clerk.

Make sure your equipment is spotless
said the colonel, 
the sergeant-major, 
and the corporal.

As civilians and reservists,
for the duration of these strange times, 
their old jobs had swirled away like dead leaves.

In civilian jobs folks can be slack: Not now.
These leaders wanted clean equipment
for a sharp mind 
in a sound body.

Their brothers in arms 
had been burned up,
gassed down, 
blasted to bits.

Their own survival was chance, 
nothing more than chance.

Comrades once on the dole, 
comrades once with grunt-jobs,
had a sharp role in this gasping world.
Now they lived with utter commitment.

Feed the wretched,
bridge the rivers, 
clear the roads.

Keep your equipment spotless.

They remember their old life 
like Tarzan remembers Lord Greystoke,
a life of gentleness and goals.
Now they live in the rough present,
surrounded by khaki,
half crude soldier and half Boy Scout.

And if
perchance
the Martians advance again,
run like hell
in an orderly fashion.

There’s no chance for slackers or heroes
When the Martians come.



At the Crossroads

At a crossroads stands the ruins
of a former general store and post office.
Here, the brush and bracken 
are being cleared by “the Tommies.”
Mostly the soldiers are young.
Some are old,
and all were cheerful reservists, together.

Now they don’t have much of a life,
 living here are at the crossroads. 

Now their days are spent handing out warehouse food,
and digging latrines and drainage ditches in the rain.
In ponchos of grey they dig and dig,
complain and joke,
and dig their ditches straight and true.

When Janet and Susan smile,
the Tommies feel warmer and dryer.
Says the ginger haired one, 
“I keep getting letters from a Las Vegas showgirl;
I told her to come here and meet you ladies.”

The royal mail had ended long ago.



Sean Crawford
Calgary
2019

Footnote: Ah, the “manpower-firepower ratio.” 
If I was a time traveler, and came across a moustachioed serviceman, from the days of horses, arguing about whether modern weapons would ruin the spirit of war, I would tell him this ratio is eternal. An Australian history professor who’s name escapes me found the ratio is 20%  no matter if the casualties come machine-swift or bayonet slow. At “20% casualty rate” defending troops will be broken in spirit; on open ground they will break and run… Homer, at the walls of Troy, described runners being mown down “like sheep before wolves.”