Poetics of Turks,
Jews and Honesty
Today I will
present the poem before the essay.
I never knew the
title of this poem; I memorized it from the preface page to Bertrand Russell’s The Conquest of Happiness.
A note on words:
E’er is an old poetic word meaning ever; spew is an informal word that today
means vomit.
By William Blake
The only man I
e’er knew
Who did not make
me almost spew
Was Fuseli; and he
was both a Turk and a Jew
And so good
Christian friends how do you do?
Obviously this poem is
about NOT being prejudiced against other people… and I am just too tired to
point out the poem’s relevance in our violent century. Too tired.
Instead I will
note the problem poets and other artists have —William Blake, by the way, both
painted and wrote poems. Their problem is they deny themselves the comfort of dishonesty. William
Shakespeare and his pals, when they staged The
Merchant of Venice, an anti-anti-Semitic play, wouldn’t pretend
the Jews were inferior. Vincent Van Gogh, painting in the Pacific, wouldn’t pretend
the natives were beneath him. Folks in Hollywood, at their parties and
bar-b-ques, back before Gays were allowed by police to have freedom of assembly,
wouldn’t pretend that being homosexual was a choice. (When did you choose to be
heterosexual?)
Richard Mason,
back when Europeans were justifying having colonies all over the world, wrote a
scene where an Englishman in India is lying in bed with a hollow heart. He is
depressed, thinking something like, “I can’t even kid myself, “I’m White, so I’m
great.”” This while he knew that other Europeans could lie to themselves. The
scene is early in the novel The Wind
Cannot Read, about a romance in wartime with a dirty little enemy alien. (I
exaggerate: She was quite a clean alien—but short…trust an artist to imagine
such a scandalous liaison)
An artist’s problem
is that her role is to see. No wonder
those people who would blindfold, hoodwink, and cover men’s minds have always
hated artists. In my youth “those people” were the communists; today they are
the Islamics. Truly, dishonesty is associated with shadows and darkness.
In my youth I had
a reputation for being a “nice guy” …partly because I was unable to be
dishonest. During my schooldays I could never join with one or two others to generate
a “reality distortion field” so we could taunt and bully a victim. No, I
believed that lying about other kids, just so I could feel important, was too
undignified. Maybe as a schoolboy I didn’t exactly have the word “dignity” in
my vocabulary, but I knew that when it came to the joy of dishonesty, my choice
was to let it go, even if this meant being frozen out of things. I never wanted
to be popular anyway.
Leaving the
sheltered palace of school, I went away to the icy tower. Away from a busy village
of unknowing people, I discovered one of the benefits of higher education is
that dishonesty, as in willful reality avoidance, does not stand the light of
day. Except, perhaps, for poor blinkered party horses, university can be one
long exciting culture shock. Freshmen gape as students organize to Take Back
the Night and have Black History Week. Students mingle. Leftist meets Buddhist,
native meets foreigner, and trailer park meets terribly posh.
A year or two ago
there was a newspaper report of a male student who wanted to avoid learning
about whether women could be equal, so he asked his professor to be excused
from any small group projects that included women. As I recall, the student
tried to claim a religious exemption, but his timing was off: Never try to be anti-women
during a War on Terror. The story went national. Or as the younger generation
would say, “it went viral.”
Offline, here in
the real world, I know a famous poet, Sheri-D Wilson. She’s awesome. With
another poet my age, Mary, I regularly meet in Sheri-D’s living room for her to
help us with our poems. It’s scary like learning to ride a bike—white knuckles,
don’t dare stop pedaling. I don’t mind at all being edited, as I came up
through journalism, but I sure find it hard to dare to see and “go deeper.” How
queer to sit on the sofa, with long underwear arms visible in my T-shirt, and
silently reflect that I can be an artist too.
Sean Crawford
Calgary
April
2015
Afterthought: It’s strange
to realize that Robert Heinlein, who wrote about practical, realistic math-loving
heroes, was surely an artist himself.
I flashed to a
scene in his novel Starman Jones one
evening on campus, as I was slowly motoring to an event, in a car driven by a
substitute teacher, when a parking control guy waved us away from parking on
the grass. Keep going. “They shouldn’t have
parking control!” said the teacher.
There’s a scene
where young Jones is talking to the old ship’s doctor. Jones has just come
clean about a lie. Was it wrong to have lied? “It was undignified!” says the
doctor. The doctor reflects: It hasn’t harmed him, and it’s good that he dropped
the lie, because getting away with it could have turned him into a permanent
adolescent, always wanting his own way. It was when the teacher spoke so
petulantly that I flashed on Jones and the doctor.
By the way, on the
last page Jones is shown making amends for his lie, like a man.
No comments:
Post a Comment